I'd like to see the difference in single and dual GPU using NVIDIA cards instead (especially a 780ti or better), and see if the performance delta is the same on the AMD GPU's. Now we see some better optimized titles/benchmarks, and bam, the damn things are keeping up with their respective intel ounterparts. They were just a little too ahead of their time (from the standpoint of AMD pushing out chips with so many cores, that lacked the IPC development they probably should of gone for instead, but it is what it is), and they really got a bad rap for their performance in their early life because they weren't being utilized properly IMO. Temps maxed out at about 71C during Unigine Valley testing, with the fans barely trying. It's the fact that they appear to perform even better the older they get (the exact same story with my 圆). Shadow Boxer by skemble - Intel Core i5-4690K, GeForce GTX 980. It is more likely to achieve a higher OC with an FX chip, thus, a 300 mhz clock difference is maintained. The systems under consideration are composed: The tradition has almost always been, Intel with top machines and top price matching and AMD looking to be strong on price / performance market. Therefore, we have to take into account this aspect to moderate the demands / expectations. It´s important to understand the characteristics of the companies when we analyze both material´s, AMD is tiny compared with Intel, the Intel budget just for ID, is probably three times the total annual budget of AMD, AMD is slightly larger than the Nvidia. This review follows on from numerous discussions about what is the best option, FX 8320/50 or I5 4670/90k, seeking to offer a reliable and homely analysis, far from any economic pressure, which as we know, often is exerted on the best known "reviewrs". Warning - This is merely a homely analysis, only expressing some benchmarks.
0 kommentar(er)
